Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> writes: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 5:28 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Don't think I like ecpg's tests behaving differently in this respect >> than the rest of them do; that seems like a recipe for unrecognized >> security issues. >> >> If nobody can think of a positive reason for pg_regress not to >> unset PGDATABASE unconditionally, let's try that and see how it >> goes.
> It would be nice to get this fixed. Several people have been confused > by it at this point. I think I just forgot about this thread. Shall we change it in HEAD and see what happens? Maybe backpatch, but not till after 12.0 is out. regards, tom lane