On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 09:08:37AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Here is my proposed patch to adjust this.
Looks fine to me reading through. I think that you are right to not change the descriptions in build_server_final_message(), as that's described similarly in RFC 5802. By renaming scram_build_verifier() to scram_build_secret() you are going to break one of my in-house extensions. I am using it to register for a user SCRAM veri^D^D^D^D secrets with custom iteration and salt length :) -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
