On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 03:43:18PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Attached is a patch to fix the issue. As we know that the old index > will have a definition and dependencies that match with the old one, I > think that we should just remove any dependency records on the new > index before moving the new set of dependencies from the old to the > new index. The patch includes regression tests that scan pg_depend to > check that everything remains consistent after REINDEX CONCURRENTLY. > > Any thoughts?
I have done more tests for this one through the day, and committed the patch. There is still one bug pending related to partitioned indexes where REINDEX CONCURRENTLY is cancelled after phase 4 (swap) has committed. I am still looking more into that. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
