On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 12:00 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > That seems like a bad idea - we add the cost multiple times. And we > still want to compare plans that potentially involve that cost, if > there's no other way to plan the query.
Yeah. I kind of wonder if we shouldn't instead (a) skip adding paths that use methods which are disabled and then (b) if we don't end up with any paths for that reloptinfo, try again, ignoring disabling GUCs. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
