Em seg., 4 de nov. de 2019 às 11:53, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> escreveu: > > On 2019-Oct-17, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > > > First, I'd like to clarify what I believe Tom's suggestion is, and then > > > talk through that, as his vote sways this topic pretty heavily. > > > > > Tom, I take it your suggestion is to have '-f -' be accepted to mean > > > 'goes to stdout' in all branches? > > > > Yes. > > +1 for this, FWIW. Let's get it done before next week minors. Is > anybody writing a patch? If not, I can do it. > I'm not.
> > > If you meant for all branches to accept '-f -' and have it go to a './-' > > > file then that's just a revert of this entire change, which I can't > > > agree with either > > > > No, I'm not proposing a full revert. But there's certainly room to > > consider reverting the part that says you *must* write "-f -" to get > > output to stdout. > > I don't think this will buy us anything, if we get past branches updated > promptly. > +1. -- Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/ PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento