Hi Michael-san, On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 4:35 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 03:12:04PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 1:13 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > >> "postgres_fdw foreign tables" sounds weird to me. Could "foreign > >> tables using postgres_fdw" be a better wording? I am wondering as > >> well if we should not split this information into two parts: one for > >> the actual error message which only mentions foreign tables, and a > >> second one with a hint to mention that postgres_fdw has been used. > > > > We use "postgres_fdw foreign tables" or "postgres_fdw tables" in > > release notes, so I thought it was OK to use that in error messages as > > well. But actually, these wordings are not suitable for error > > messages? > > It is true that the docs of postgres_fdw use that and that it is used > in some comments. Still, I found this wording a bit weird.. If you > think that what you have is better, I am also fine to let you have the > final word, so please feel to ignore me :)
I'd like to hear the opinions of others. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita