Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:03:08PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: >> I had to go hunt around with Dependency Walker to figure out the actual >> missing DLL the last time I had to deal with this.
> Ahah. Yes, That's exactly what I used a couple of years back on that. > These errors are hard to track and find. I feel the pain on this --- indirect dependencies are not well reported on any platform that I deal with :-(. Still, I'm having a hard time convincing myself that this patch is a good idea. It seems very likely that it will break some startup scenarios, and the incremental benefit in error reporting seems marginal. regards, tom lane