On Tue, 2019-11-19 at 13:21 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Laurenz Albe <laurenz.a...@cybertec.at> writes: > > On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 13:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Laurenz Albe <laurenz.a...@cybertec.at> writes: > > > > On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 17:17 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > It might be worth clarifying this point in section 5.7, > > > > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/ddl-priv.html > > I like your second sentence, but I think that "the right ... is inherent > > in being the ... owner" is unnecessarily complicated. > > Removing the "always" and "only" makes the apparent contradiction between > > the sentences less jarring to me. > > I think it's important to emphasize that this is implicit in object > ownership. > > Looking at the page again, I notice that there's a para a little further > down that overlaps quite a bit with what we're discussing here, but it's > about implicit grant options rather than the right to DROP. In the > attached, I reworded that too, and moved it because it's not fully > intelligible until we've explained grant options. Thoughts?
I am fine with that. Yours, Laurenz Albe
