On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:26 PM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On the other hand, 0002 seems like it's pretty clearly a good idea. It > makes a whole bunch of auxiliary processes use > procsignal_sigusr1_handler() and those things all get called from > AuxiliaryProcessMain(), which does ProcSignalInit(), and it seems like > clearly the right idea that processes which register to participate in > the procsignal mechanism should also register to get notified if they > receive a procsignal. I think that the reason we haven't bothered with > this up until now is because I think that it's presently impossible > for any of the kind of procsignals that we have to get sent to any of > those processes. But, global barriers would require us to do so, so it > seems like it's time to tighten that up, and it doesn't really cost > anything. So I propose to commit this part soon, unless somebody > objects.
Done. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
