On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 at 10:19, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 8:29 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 5:44 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 2:31 PM Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > Ok. I tested pg94_95_use_vfd_for_logrep.patch for 9.6 branch, and it >>> > works there. So please use this patch for all the three branches. >>> > >>> >>> Pushed! >> >> >> >> I see one failure in REL_10_STABLE [1] which seems to be due to this commit: >> > > I tried this test on my CentOs and Power8 machine more than 50 times, but > couldn't reproduce it. So, adding Noah to see if he can try this test [1] on > his machine (tern) and get stack track or some other information? > > [1] - make -C src/test/recovery/ check PROVE_TESTS=t/006_logical_decoding.pl
I also tested multiple times using PG 10 branch; also tried to inject an error so that PG_CATCH related code also gets covered, but unfortunately didn't get the crash on my machine. I guess, we will have to somehow get the stacktrace. > > -- > With Regards, > Amit Kapila. > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Thanks, -Amit Khandekar EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company