On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:22 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > One thing to note is that there are places in code where we use > 'table' instead of 'relation' for the same thing in the error messages > as seen in the below places (the first one uses 'relation', the second > one uses 'table') and the patch is using 'relation' which I think is > fine.
We often use "relation" as a sort of a weasel-word when we don't know the relkind; i.e. when we're complaining about something that might be a view or index or foreign table or whatever. If we say "table," we need to know that it is, precisely, a table. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
