On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 7:46 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 03:31:21PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > It might be better to move it to next CF as the discussion is still active. > > OK, just did that. >
I have marked this as committed in CF. This was committed some time back[1][2]. I was just waiting for the conclusion on what we want to do about Windows behavior related to socket closure which we discovered while testing this feature. It is not very clear whether we want to do anything about it, see discussion on thread [3], so I closed this. [1] - https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=1379fd537f9fc7941c8acff8c879ce3636dbdb77 [2] - https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=80e05a088e4edd421c9c0374d54d787c8a4c0d86 [3] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm2tEvr_Kum7SyvFn0%3D6H3P0P-Zkhnd%3DdkkX%2BQ%3DwKutZ%3DA%40mail.gmail.com -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
