On 06/02/2020 03:56, Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 06/02/2020 03:38, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:21:11AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> I'm not really against this change but, given how long it's been the
>>>> way that it is, I think we shouldn't make it without more plus votes.
>>>> If we've actually got a broad consensus on it, sure, but I don't think
>>>> 4 votes is a broad consensus.
>>>
>>> Fair point.  I'm still abstaining, but maybe this should be proposed
>>> on pgsql-general to try to get more opinions?
>>
>> Indeed, still I am not sure what kind of number is enough to define a
>> large consensus.  Vik, could you start a new thread on -general?
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/3d8e809b-fc26-87c5-55ac-616a98d2b0be%40postgresfriends.org

The vote here was 6 yeas and 1 nay (85.7%) with 2 abstentions.

The poll on pgsql-general has gone stale with 19 yeas and 2 nays (90.5%).

My poll on Twitter has ended with 33 yeas and 4 nays (89.2%).
https://twitter.com/pg_xocolatl/status/1225258876527874048

There is a little bit of overlap within those three groups but among the
minuscule percentage of our users that responded, the result is
overwhelmingly in favor of this change.
-- 
Vik Fearing


Reply via email to