On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 08:28, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> marcelo zen escribió: > > I'd rather have releases being made when the software is ready and not > when > > the calendar year mandates it. > > It seems like a terrible idea. > > But we do actually release on calendar year. While it seems not > unreasonable that we might fail to ship in time, that would likely lead > to one month, two months of delay. Four months? I don't think anybody > even imagines such a long delay. It would be seen as utter, > unacceptable failure of our release team. > All said, I think there's some merit to avoiding a PostgreSQL 13 release, because there's enough superstition out there about the infamous "number 13." Perhaps we could avert it by doing an "April Fool's Postgres 13" release? -- When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"
