> On 17 Feb 2020, at 10:42, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 03:55:46PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: >> I propose this small fix for 27.4. Progress Reporting: >> >> - all of its partitions are also recursively analyzed as also mentioned on >> + all of its partitions are also recursively analyzed as also mentioned in >> <xref linkend="sql-analyze"/>. >> >> Note the last word: "in" sounds more correct. > > What you are suggesting sounds much better to me than the original. > Do others have comments or objections?
In my understanding, the difference comes from how the link is interpreted, is the mention "on a webpage" or "in a section". Personally I prefer 'in' as it works for the PDF docs as well as the web docs. In doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml there is similar instance where we've used "in <xref ..": "As mentioned in <xref linkend="xact-serializable"/>, Serializable transactions are just Repeatable Read transactions which add" Changing as per the patch makes these consistent, so +1 on doing that. cheers ./daniel