> On 5 Mar 2020, at 21:52, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes: >> Having code which is untested and not excercised by developers (or users, if >> my >> assumption holds), yet being reachable by SQL, runs the risk of introducing >> subtle bugs. Is there a usecase for keeping it, or can/should it be removed >> in >> 14? That would still leave a lot of supported versions to upgrade to in case >> there are users to need this. > > Pushed. Looking at the original commit, I noticed one now-obsolete > comment that should also be removed, so I did that.
Thanks, I was looking around but totally missed that comment. cheers ./daniel
