James Coleman <jtc...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:44 PM Tomas Vondra
> <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> 1) I see a bunch of failures in the regression test, due to minor
>> differences in the explain output. All the differences are about minor
>> changes in memory usage, like this:
>>
>> - "Sort Space Used": 30, +
>> + "Sort Space Used": 29, +
>>
>> I'm not sure if it happens on my machine only, but maybe the test is not
>> entirely stable.
> make check passes on multiple machines for me; what arch/distro are you using?
I think there's exactly zero chance of such output being stable across
different platforms, particularly 32-vs-64-bit. You'll need to either
drop that test or find some way to mask the variability.
> Is there a better way to test these? I would prefer these code paths
> have test coverage, but the standard SQL tests don't leave a good way
> to handle stuff like this.
In some places we use plpgsql code to filter the EXPLAIN output.
regards, tom lane
