On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 02:38:51PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > |One disadvantage of decreasing vacuum_freeze_min_age is that it might cause > > |VACUUM to do useless work: freezing a row version is a waste of time if > > the row > > |is modified soon thereafter (causing it to acquire a new XID). So the > > setting > > |should be large enough that rows are not frozen until they are unlikely to > > |change any more. > > I think the overhead here might be a bit overstated. Once a page is
Could you clarify if you mean the language in docs in general or specifically in the context of this patch ? -- Justin
