Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Ah, I hadn't checked -- I was taking the function and struct names at
> face value, but it turns out that they're lies as well -- parse_real,
> relopt_real all parsing/storing doubles *is* confusing.

Yeah, that's certainly true.  I wonder if we could rename them
without causing a lot of pain for extensions?

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to