Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > Is it visibly bad when looking at the .s of gistget.c "directly", or > when disassembling the fiinal binary? Because I've seen linkers screw up > on a larger scale than I'd have expected in the past.
Yes, the bogus asm that I showed was from gistget.s, not from
disassembling.
regards, tom lane
