On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:01 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 8:51 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Agreed. I've attached the updated patch. > > > > > > Thank you for testing, Dilip! > > > > Thanks! One hunk is failing on the latest head. And, I have rebased > > the patch for my testing so posting the same. I have done some more > > testing to test multi-pass vacuum. > > > > The patch looks good to me. I have done a few minor modifications (a) > moved the declaration of variable closer to where it is used, (b) > changed a comment, (c) ran pgindent. I have also done some additional > testing with more number of indexes and found that vacuum and parallel > vacuum used the same number of total_read_blks and that is what is > expected here. > > Let me know what you think of the attached?
The patch looks fine to me. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
