> On Apr 2, 2020, at 9:06 AM, Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > ("xid8_current" is not exercised by name anywhere in the regression suite, > that I can see.) I spoke too soon. That's exercised in the new xid.sql test file. It didn't show up in my 'git diff', because it's new. Sorry about that. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
- Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast? Thomas Munro
- Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast... Thomas Munro
- Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid ... Mark Dilger
- Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->... Mark Dilger
- Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid ... Alvaro Herrera
- Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->... Andres Freund
- Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8-... Mark Dilger
- Re: Should we add xid_current() or a ... James Coleman
- Re: Should we add xid_current() or a ... Andres Freund
- Re: Should we add xid_current() o... Mark Dilger
- Re: Should we add xid_current... Andres Freund
- Re: Should we add xid_current... Mark Dilger
- Re: Should we add xid_current... Mark Dilger
- Re: Should we add xid_current... Thomas Munro