Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> writes: > One thing to I must clarify: coverage for most of pgoutput.c looks > okay on each run. I am concerned that the coverage for the code added > by the patch is shown to be close to zero, which is a mystery to me, > because I can confirm by other means such as debugging elogs() to next > to the new code that the newly added tests do cover them.
According to https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/replication/pgoutput/index.html the coverage is pretty good. Maybe you're doing something wrong in enabling coverage testing locally? regards, tom lane
