On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 1:18 AM Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> >> Do I need to precede those with some recursive chmod commands? Perhaps
> >> the client should refuse to run if there is still something left after
> >> these.
> >
> > I think the latter would be a very good idea, just so that this sort of
> > failure is less obscure.  Not sure about whether a recursive chmod is
> > really going to be worth the cycles.  (On the other hand, the normal
> > case should be that there's nothing there anyway, so maybe it's not
> > going to be costly.)
>
> Could it be a two-stage process to minimize cost but still be resilient?
>
>    rmtree
>    if (-d $DIR) {
>      emit warning
>      chmodtree
>      rmtree again
>      if (-d $DIR)
>        emit error
>    }
>


I thought about doing that. However, it's not really necessary. In the
normal course of events these directories should have been removed at
the end of the previous run, so we're only dealing with exceptional
cases here.

cheers

andrew



-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


Reply via email to