Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
> On 2020/04/09 16:11, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
>> At Wed, 08 Apr 2020 16:35:46 -0400, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote in
>>> Why is this getting grafted onto BEGIN/START TRANSACTION in the
>>> first place?
>> The rationale for not being a fmgr function is stated in the following
>> comments. [...]
> This issue happens because the function is executed after BEGIN? If yes,
> what about executing the function (i.e., as separate transaction) before
> BEGIN?
> If so, the snapshot taken in the function doesn't affect the subsequent
> transaction whatever its isolation level is.
I wonder whether making it a procedure, rather than a plain function,
would help any.
regards, tom lane
