On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 7:05 PM Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> wrote: > > > No problem. I think I was trying to make my text similar to that from > 14a4f6f37. > > I realized that I didn't sq!uash my last patch, so it didn't include the > functional change (which is maybe what Robert was referring to). >
I think it is better to add a new test for temporary table which has less data. We don't want to increase test timings to test the combination of options. I changed that in the attached patch. I will commit this tomorrow unless you or anyone else has any more comments. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
v4-0001-Fix-the-usage-of-parallel-and-full-options-of-vacuum.patch
Description: Binary data
