Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:41:39AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
>>> This has been committed just after beta1 has been stamped. So it
>>> means that it won't be included in it, right?
>> Right.
> Still, wouldn't it be better to wait until the version is tagged?
Yeah, that would have been better per project protocol: if a tarball
re-wrap becomes necessary then it would be messy not to include this
change along with fixing whatever urgent bug there might be.
However, I thought the case for delaying this fix till post-wrap was kind
of thin anyway, so if that does happen I won't be too fussed about it.
Otherwise I would've said something earlier on this thread.
regards, tom lane
