On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 10:59:05AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > What's the point of that change? I think the differentiation between > heapam_handler.c and heapam.c could be clearer, but if anything, I'd > argue that heap_get_latest_tid is sufficiently low-level that it'd > belong in heapam.c.
Well, heap_get_latest_tid() is only called in heapam_handler.c if anything, as it is not used elsewhere and not publish it. And IMO we should try to encourage using table_get_latest_tid() instead if some plugins need that. Anyway, if you are opposed to this change, I won't push hard for it either. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
