>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
[...] Tom> so that a finite value should never map to INT[64]_MIN, making it Tom> safe to do as you suggest. I agree that distinguishing +Inf from Tom> NaN is probably more useful than distinguishing it from the very Tom> largest class of finite values, so will do it as you suggest. Tom> Thanks! It would make sense to make sure there's a test case in which at least one value of all three of: a finite value much greater than 10^332, a +Inf, and a NaN were all present in the same sort, if there isn't one already. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
