Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> writes:
>> On 29 Jun 2020, at 21:27, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hmm ... so I guess my reaction to both of these is "what guarantees
>> that we get to the part of the script that does the unlinks?".
> That being said, we do retain temporary files on such failures on purpose in
> our TestLib since 88802e068017bee8cea7a5502a712794e761c7b5 and a few follow-up
> commits since, should these be handled differently? They are admittedly less
> "unknown" as compared to other files as they are copies, but famous last words
> have been spoken about bugs that can never happen.
Oh, good point. Objection withdrawn.
regards, tom lane
