st 1. 7. 2020 v 16:14 odesÃlatel Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > In my experience, there's certainly demand for some kind of mode where > > plpgsql functions get checked at function definition time, rather than > > at execution time. > > Yeah, absolutely agreed. But I'm afraid this proposal takes us too > far in the other direction: with this, you *must* have a 100% parseable > and semantically valid function body, every time all the time. > > So far as plpgsql is concerned, I could see extending the validator > to run parse analysis (not just raw parsing) on all SQL statements in > the body. This wouldn't happen of course with check_function_bodies off, > so it wouldn't affect dump/reload. But likely there would still be > demand for more fine-grained control over it ... or maybe it could > stop doing analysis as soon as it finds a DDL command? > This simple analysis stops on first record type usage. PLpgSQL allows some dynamic work that increases the complexity of static analysis. Regards Pavel > regards, tom lane > > >
