rebased Thanks,
Dave Cramer On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 06:43, Dave Cramer <[email protected]> wrote: > Honestly I'm getting a little weary of fixing this up only to have the > patch not get reviewed. > > Apparently it has no value so unless someone is willing to review it and > get it committed I'm just going to let it go. > > Thanks, > > Dave Cramer > > > On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 04:53, Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > On 7 Apr 2020, at 21:45, Dave Cramer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > New patch that fixes a number of errors in the check for validity as >> well as reduces the memory usage by >> > dynamically allocating the data changed as well as collapsing the >> changed and binary arrays into a format array. >> >> The 0001 patch fails to apply, and possibly other in the series. Please >> submit >> a rebased version. Marking the CF entry as Waiting for Author in the >> meantime. >> >> cheers ./daniel > >
0001-First-pass-at-working-code-without-subscription-opti.patch
Description: Binary data
0005-Remove-C99-declaration-and-code.patch
Description: Binary data
0002-add-binary-column-to-pg_subscription.patch
Description: Binary data
0004-get-relid-inside-of-logical_read_insert.patch
Description: Binary data
0003-document-new-binary-option-for-CREATE-SUBSCRIPTION.patch
Description: Binary data
0006-make-sure-the-subcription-is-marked-as-binary.patch
Description: Binary data
0007-check-that-the-subscriber-is-compatible-with-the-pub.patch
Description: Binary data
0008-Changed-binary-and-changed-to-format-and-use-existin.patch
Description: Binary data
