On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 09:57:08PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: > > I think that we should offer something like hash_mem that can work as > > a multiple of work_mem, for the reason that Justin mentioned > > recently. > > This can be justified as something that more or less maintains some > > kind of continuity with the old design. > > Didn't Justin argue against using a multiplier? > https://postgr.es/m/20200703024649.gj4...@telsasoft.com
I recanted. https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200703145620.gk4...@telsasoft.com -- Justin
