On 7/8/20 5:17 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On 2020-Jul-08, David Steele wrote:
On 7/8/20 4:39 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
I think this phrasing in the original/updated version is pretty awkward:
+ A standby server that cannot be connected to until it is promoted to a
+ primary server is called a ...
Yeah.
How about:
+ A standby server that must be promoted to a primary server before
+ accepting connections is called a ...
How about just reducing it to "A standby server that doesn't accept
connection is called a ..."? We don't really need to explain that if
you do promote the standby it will start accept connections -- do we?
It should be pretty obvious if you promote a standby, it will cease to
be a standby in the first place. This verbiage seems excessive.
Works for me.
Regards,
--
-David
da...@pgmasters.net
