Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> I think it'd be a good plan to adopt the beta on master.

> We already have parts of it backpacked, there have been things we couldn't 
> easily do because of bugs in 2.69. There aren't that many changes to 
> configure it total, and particularly not in the back branches. So I think 
> it'd be ok overhead wise.

Yeah.  Because we'd want to rip out those hacks, it's not quite as simple
as "regenerate configure with this other autoconf version"; somebody will
have to do some preliminary investigation and produce a patch for the
autoconf input files.  Peter, were you intending to do that?

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to