Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > I think it'd be a good plan to adopt the beta on master.
> We already have parts of it backpacked, there have been things we couldn't > easily do because of bugs in 2.69. There aren't that many changes to > configure it total, and particularly not in the back branches. So I think > it'd be ok overhead wise. Yeah. Because we'd want to rip out those hacks, it's not quite as simple as "regenerate configure with this other autoconf version"; somebody will have to do some preliminary investigation and produce a patch for the autoconf input files. Peter, were you intending to do that? regards, tom lane