On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 1:04 AM Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 08:56:06PM +0200, Daniel Verite wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As a follow-up to bug #16570 [1] and other previous discussions > > on the mailing-lists, I'm checking out PG13 beta for Windows > > from: > > https://www.enterprisedb.com/postgresql-early-experience > > and it ships with the same obsolete ICU 53 that was used > > for PG 10,11,12. > > Besides not having the latest Unicode features and fixes, ICU 53 > > ignores the BCP 47 tags syntax in collations used as examples > > in Postgres documentation, which leads to confusion and > > false bug reports. > > The current version is ICU 67. > > > > I don't see where the suggestion to upgrade it before the > > next PG release should be addressed but maybe some people on > > this list do know or have the leverage to make it happen? > > Well, you can ask EDB about this, but perhaps the have kept the same ICU > version so indexes will not need to be reindexed. > Correct - updating ICU would mean a reindex is required following any upgrade, major or minor. I would really like to find an acceptable solution to this however as it really would be good to be able to update ICU. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
