On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 09:06:16PM +1200, David Rowley wrote: > FWIW, the tests I did to check this when initially working on it are > in [1]. Justin, it would be good if you could verify you're making as > bad as what's mentioned on that thread again.
Ouch. Thanks for the reference. Indeed it looks that it would hurt even with just a simple PL function. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
