On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:39 AM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coe...@gmail.com> wrote: > The other two messages for reporting unused items and dead items > remain the same. Hence, with above change, we would be reporting the > following 4 messages: > > NOTICE: skipping all the tids in block %u for relation "%s" because > the block number is out of range > > NOTICE: skipping tid (%u, %u) for relation "%s" because the item > number is out of range for this block > > NOTICE: skipping tid (%u, %u) for relation "%s" because it is marked dead > > NOTICE: skipping tid (%u, %u) for relation "%s" because it is marked unused > > Please let me know if you are okay with the above changes or not?
That seems broadly reasonable, but I would suggest phrasing the first message like this: skipping block %u for relation "%s" because the block number is out of range -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
