Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> writes:
> While hacking on pg_rewind, this in pg_rewind's main() function caught 
> my eye:

Good catch.

> Attached is a patch to fix this, as well as a similar issue in 
> pg_checksums. pg_basebackup and pgbench also print progres reports like 
> this, but they seem correct to me.

I wonder whether it'd be better to push the responsibility for this
into progress_report(), by adding an additional parameter "bool last"
or the like.  Then the callers would not need such an unseemly amount
of knowledge about what progress_report() is doing.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to