At Mon, 24 Aug 2020 21:49:40 -0400, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote in > > > Are you saying we should _require_ clientcert=verify-full when 'cert' > > > authentication is used? I don't see the point of that --- I just > > > updated the docs to say doing so was duplicate behavior. > > > > I don't suggest changing the current behavior. I'm saying it is the > > way it is working and we should correctly error-out that since it > > doesn't work as specified.
Sorry, I mistead you. I don't suggest verify-full is needed for cert authentication. I said we should just reject the combination cert+veriry-ca. > Uh, I don't understand what 'combination the same way with > "cert"+"no-verify"'. Right now, cert with no clientcert/verify line > works just fine. Is "no-verify" something special? Are you saying it > is any random string that would generate an error? It was delimited as "We should reject (that)" "that combination (=cert+ferify-ca)" "the same way(=error-out)" "with cert+no-verify". regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
