On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 09:27:33AM +0530, Rahila Syed wrote: > TBH, I am not sure. I think it is a reasonable change. It is even > indicated in the > comment above index_set_state_flags() that it can be made transactional. > At the same time, probably we can just go ahead with current > inconsistent update of relisreplident and indisvalid flags. Can't see what > will break with that.
Yeah, that's true as well. Still, I would like to see first if people are fine with changing this code path to be transactional. This way, we will have zero history in the tree where there was a risk for an inconsistent window. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
