On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:41 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes: > > So, can we assume that the current code can only cause the problem in > > CCA builds bot not in any practical scenario because after having a > > lock on relation probably there shouldn't be any invalidation which > > leads to this problem? > > > In short: the value of CCA testing is to model sinval overruns > happening at any point where they could happen. The real-world > odds of one happening at any given instant are low, but they're > never zero. >
Thanks for the explanation. I have read your patch and it looks good to me. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
