From: Jamison, Kirk/ジャミソン カーク <k.jami...@fujitsu.com> > I also did not remove the duplicate code from smgrnblocks because Amit-san > mentioned that when the caching for non-recovery cases is implemented, we > can use it for non-recovery cases as well.
But the extra code is not used now. The code for future usage should be added when it becomes necessary. Duplicate code may make people think that you should add an argument to smgrnblocks() instead of adding a new function. + if (reln->smgr_cached_nblocks[forknum] != InvalidBlockNumber) + return reln->smgr_cached_nblocks[forknum]; + else + return InvalidBlockNumber; Anyway, the else block is redundant, as the variable contains InvalidBlockNumber. Also, as Amit-san mentioned, the cause of the slight performance regression when shared_buffers is small needs to be investigated and addressed. I think you can do it after sharing the performance result with a large shared_buffers. I found no other problem. Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
