From: Jamison, Kirk/ジャミソン カーク <k.jami...@fujitsu.com>
> Recovery performance measurement results below.
> But it seems there are overhead even with large shared buffers.
>
> | s_b | master | patched | %reg |
> |-------|--------|---------|-------|
> | 128MB | 36.052 | 39.451 | 8.62% |
> | 1GB | 21.731 | 21.73 | 0.00% |
> | 20GB | 24.534 | 25.137 | 2.40% |
> | 100GB | 30.54 | 31.541 | 3.17% |
Did you really check that the optimization path is entered and the traditional
path is never entered?
With the following code, when the main fork does not meet the optimization
criteria, other forks are not optimized as well. You want to determine each
fork's optimization separately, don't you?
+ /* If blocks are invalid, exit the optimization and execute
full scan */
+ if (nTotalBlocks == InvalidBlockNumber)
+ break;
+ else
+ break;
+ }
for (i = 0; i < NBuffers; i++)
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
