On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:16 PM Greg Nancarrow <gregn4...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Vignesh and Bharath, > > Seems like the Parallel Copy patch is regarding RI_TRIGGER_PK as > parallel-unsafe. > Can you explain why this is?
Yes we don't need to restrict parallelism for RI_TRIGGER_PK cases as we don't do any command counter increments while performing PK checks as opposed to RI_TRIGGER_FK/foreign key checks. We have modified this in the v6 patch set. Regards, Vignesh EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
