On 2020-10-21 15:13:36 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > It seems this one also very much would need a timeout value.
I'm not really against that, but I wonder if we just end up reimplementing statement timeout...
On 2020-10-21 15:13:36 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > It seems this one also very much would need a timeout value.
I'm not really against that, but I wonder if we just end up reimplementing statement timeout...