On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 03:46:14PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 03:24:35PM -0400, John Naylor wrote: > > As I mentioned in [1], I've volunteered to clear out the TODO list of items > > that appear to be too difficult, controversial, or otherwise not worth > > doing to > > warrant being listed there. I'll be working a few sections at a time, and > > every > > so often I'll have a list of proposed items for removal. If I don't hear > > objections, I'll remove the items after a few days while going through the > > next > > set. > > > > Where there's an email thread, I've skimmed a few messages to get a sense of > > the community's thoughts on it. Where easily determined, I've taken age into > > account, insofar as something from 2017 is going to get much more benefit of > > doubt than something from 2008. I've added after each item a phrase that > > sums > > up the reason I believe it doesn't belong anymore. Feedback welcome, of > > course, > > although I suspect there won't be much. > > Thanks for working on this. It certainly needs new eyes (not mine). ;-) > > I am fine reomving all the items below. I am kind of disappointed we > have these _stuck_ items, but I don't see a clear way forward, so let's > just remove them and see what requests we get for them.
Do any of these limitations need to be documented before removing them from the TODO list? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee