On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 12:44 PM Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 01:38:14PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: > > Hi all > > > > I noticed that when recovery.conf was removed in 2dedf4d9a8 (yay!) the > docs for > > it were removed completely as well. That's largely sensible, but is > confusing > > when users have upgraded and are trying to find out what happened, or > how to > > configure equivalent functionality. > > I don't see the logic in carrying doc stuff that we don't have anymore. > > I do. Saying why something went away has value. For small stuff you have commit messages. For user-facing documentation stuff that warranted its own page, having said page remain and describe the change seems worthwhile. David J.
