On 11/12/20 8:37 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 11 Nov 2020, at 21:44, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
>> If people like this idea I'll add tests and docco and add it to the next CF.
> Sounds like a good idea, please do.
>
> Can this case really happen in non-ancient OpenSSL version?
> + if (!x509name)
Probably not. I'll get rid of that.
> Doesn't this returnpath need a pfree(peer_cn)?
> + bio = BIO_new(BIO_s_mem());
> + if (!bio)
> + {
> + return -1;
> + }
>
Yeah, I'll make another pass over the cleanups.
Thanks for reviewing.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
