On 11/12/20 8:37 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> On 11 Nov 2020, at 21:44, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: >> If people like this idea I'll add tests and docco and add it to the next CF. > Sounds like a good idea, please do. > > Can this case really happen in non-ancient OpenSSL version? > + if (!x509name)
Probably not. I'll get rid of that. > Doesn't this returnpath need a pfree(peer_cn)? > + bio = BIO_new(BIO_s_mem()); > + if (!bio) > + { > + return -1; > + } > Yeah, I'll make another pass over the cleanups. Thanks for reviewing. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com