On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 06:42, Craig Ringer <craig.rin...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 7:24 PM Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >> >> What I'm proposing is an option to add 16 bytes onto each COMMIT >> record > > > Would it make sense to write this at the time we write a topxid assignment to > WAL instead? > > Otherwise it won't be accessible to streaming-mode logical decoding.
Do you mean extend the xl_xact_assignment record? My understanding is that is not sent in all cases, so not sure what you mean by "instead". -- Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/